Sorry I’m dumb and misread it. Its technically false but that’s disingenuous. My brain read it as “could power <number> more homes…” Which is false because supply and demand stuff. I’m kind of a stickler for (against?) lying with statistics.
Ok, check the stat sources. Right. I’m betting they are valid just thinking about how much fossil fuels are expended in a war, how much all those bombs and weapons cost, and how good solar can be in a sunny climate like the US Southwest or the Middle East.
Sorry I’m dumb and misread it. Its technically false but that’s disingenuous. My brain read it as “could power <number> more homes…” Which is false because supply and demand stuff. I’m kind of a stickler for (against?) lying with statistics.
Ok, check the stat sources. Right. I’m betting they are valid just thinking about how much fossil fuels are expended in a war, how much all those bombs and weapons cost, and how good solar can be in a sunny climate like the US Southwest or the Middle East.
Yeah they are likely valid. Like I said–i’m a stickler.