@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agoRubber ducky, ur the onemander.xyzimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down18
arrow-up1471arrow-down1imageRubber ducky, ur the onemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareCanadian_Cabinet linkfedilinkEnglish15•6 months agoYou’ve clearly never seen the prices people pay for marine fish
minus-squarekamenLady.linkEnglish19•edit-26 months agoTrue - that’s why i only buy terrestrial fish, they are way cheaper and don’t demand as much care as the wet ones. Edit: i was joking, but mudskippers are even more expensive, around 50 dollars.
minus-squareZagorathlinkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months ago terrestrial fish You joke, but… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVjSJV0WoDQ
minus-squareRose Thorne(She/Her)linkfedilinkEnglish5•6 months agoThat’s why I don’t have a tank. But it’s not an off comparison, you can get up to 20-30 common variety isopods for $10-15 US. When you’re looking at setting up a stable breeding population for a fairly self-sufficient terrarium, that’s going to get expensive with Rubber Duckies.
You’ve clearly never seen the prices people pay for marine fish
True - that’s why i only buy terrestrial fish, they are way cheaper and don’t demand as much care as the wet ones.
Edit: i was joking, but mudskippers are even more expensive, around 50 dollars.
✨ freshwater fish 💫
You joke, but… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVjSJV0WoDQ
That’s why I don’t have a tank.
But it’s not an off comparison, you can get up to 20-30 common variety isopods for $10-15 US. When you’re looking at setting up a stable breeding population for a fairly self-sufficient terrarium, that’s going to get expensive with Rubber Duckies.