• @blazera
      link
      English
      -86 months ago

      The bulk has been money to highways. Nothing else comes close

      • @[email protected]OPM
        link
        fedilink
        206 months ago

        Yes, a lot of money is spent on things like repairing highways. “Just don’t maintain the bridge” isn’t a good move.

        • @blazera
          link
          English
          -86 months ago

          Its poison for any effort to curb climate change. The concrete production alone is a major source of greenhouse gases, and its being done to further prioritize the single largest source of emissions in the US, personal vehicles. I cant think of a more effective thing to spend money on if the goal is to accelerate climate change.

            • @blazera
              link
              English
              06 months ago

              This shit is like clean coal. Its not a thing, concrete production involves releasing the co2 from calcium carbonate, not even mentioning the heating and fuel requirements that go into that process. These highways are going to be built with conventional concrete.

              • @[email protected]OPM
                link
                fedilink
                126 months ago

                The problem hasn’t been “you can’t do it” but “architects and engineers don’t have enough experience with it to trust it, so they don’t use it” — a federal government purchasing program can fix that.

                • @blazera
                  link
                  English
                  -36 months ago

                  You literally cant do it, its a chemical reaction that outputs co2. In the same way you cant run a combustion engine without producing co2.

                  • @[email protected]OPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    106 months ago

                    You can use a different chemistry to make a hard substance. There are a ton of options which look good in tests, and pretty much nobody uses them.