• @dhork
    link
    English
    86 months ago

    It’s all statistics. It means that if we ran the 2024 election millions of times in his model, Trump would win more than Biden. But we will only get one shot, so the number is kind of useless.

    I was watching the Mets game this weekend on ESPN, and they were ahead of the Cubs by a few runs. ESPN has a tracker that estimates “Win Probability” and their model gave the Mets a 75% chance to win. But have you seen the Mets this year? They’ve blown a bunch of games late. Every Mets fan watching knew that their bullpen wasn’t good enough to merit that rating.

    The Mets did end up winning that game. (Thanks, Grimace.) But that doesn’t change the fact that no matter what math is behind their win prediction model, it just doesn’t feel right to apply statistics like that to one-off events.

      • Optional
        link
        6
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I predict people will get sick of that shit. Especially when they start branding it as AI-driven.

        Edit: with the exception of that football-predicting octopus. He’s cool.

      • @dhork
        link
        English
        46 months ago

        Don’t worry, little Yankee fan. It’s not your fault you ran headfirst into the Grimace Effect. Now come closer – I need to bottle up some of those tears for comfort when the wheels fall off the wagon after the ASG, as is tradition.

    • @aodhsishaj
      link
      56 months ago

      Don’t ignore the flawed polling data his model is based on