@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 5 months agoWhat the Supreme Court Chevron decision means for environmental rules | The decision could make it easier for courts to block ambitious climate and wildlife regulations.wapo.stexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down10
arrow-up190arrow-down1external-linkWhat the Supreme Court Chevron decision means for environmental rules | The decision could make it easier for courts to block ambitious climate and wildlife regulations.wapo.st@[email protected]M to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•5 months agoIt doesn’t even need to be ambitious. It just has to be ambiguous.
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilink1•5 months agoBut what does “has to” mean anyways? The reality is motivated judge can rule pretty much anything as “ambiguous”
It doesn’t even need to be ambitious. It just has to be ambiguous.
But what does “has to” mean anyways? The reality is motivated judge can rule pretty much anything as “ambiguous”