downpunxx to Lemmy Shitpost • 6 months agogotdamnfedia.ioimagemessage-square206fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down125cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imagegotdamnfedia.iodownpunxx to Lemmy Shitpost • 6 months agomessage-square206fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareEleventhHourlink1•6 months agoWater can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•6 months agoid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
minus-squareEleventhHourlink0•edit-26 months agoAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.
minus-squareEleventhHourlink0•6 months agoHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.
thats because water is already wet 😂
Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
like water
Not at all
id argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy.
Fire is not a liquid.
i didnt say it was a liquid
Hence the fallacies.
Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.
liquids which are…wet