• @WhatAmLemmy
      link
      English
      293 months ago

      They do, and it will only be “official” when a Republican does it. Once they control the courts, it’s game over. Nothing short of unstacking the court will avert a fascist dictatorship.

      • Schadrach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        I do find it amusing that SCOTUS made a ruling that legalizes having them assassinated as an “official act” though. After all, being in contact with intelligence agencies is definitely an official act as is writing pardons, so he can always pardon the assassin(s) afterward.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They remanded to the lower courts to determine that. But like it does have some implication. They definitely did not say everything the president does is an official action.

      • @BertramDitore
        link
        English
        213 months ago

        And who gets to decide if a lower court decision stands? You guessed it, the Supreme Court. This was always going to be their ultimate decision.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          So doesn’t that mean the US didn’t really ever have separation of powers? Sounds like the door to fascism wasn’t locked and we just used the honour system.

          • @BertramDitore
            link
            English
            13 months ago

            Yeah, that’s unfortunately right. So much of the American system is based on norms and ideals that we trusted our leaders to respect. The Supreme Court has seized their authority, and since they refuse to recognize Congressional oversight (the Chief Justice has regularly refused to appear before Congress), there’s very little we can do.

    • @chakan2
      link
      English
      23 months ago

      Congress. Since Congress isn’t functional, that means whatever the president does is now legal.