@Rapidcreek to politics • 3 months agoThe Absurdity of the Dump-Biden Uprisingwww.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square85arrow-up1166arrow-down164
arrow-up1102arrow-down1external-linkThe Absurdity of the Dump-Biden Uprisingwww.theatlantic.com@Rapidcreek to politics • 3 months agomessage-square85
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•3 months agoAnd the national convention hasn’t happened yet. He’s not officially the candidate until appointed at the convention.
minus-square@RapidcreekOPlink-7•3 months agoI guess the point is that to replace Biden would drive chaos that would last longer than 4 months and be self defeating.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•3 months agoBiden is self defeating. I don’t see how he can win at this point. 2020 was pretty close.
minus-square@RapidcreekOPlink-6•3 months agoThen just resign yourself to Trump winning, and spend the next years whining.
minus-square@ceenotelink3•3 months agoOr push to have another nominee, one who can beat the extremely unpopular republican.
minus-square@RapidcreekOPlink-3•3 months agoSlipping a new nominee in has the result of chaos. But, if you consider that chaos will not be a problem, then you don’t remember Eagleton.
minus-square@Ensign_CrablinkEnglish1•3 months agoSounds to me like chaos is a threat and not a prediction. When centrists don’t get their very first choice, they form PACs to elect Republicans.
minus-square@RapidcreekOPlink-1•3 months agoBeing called a “centerist” always makes me laugh. I can just imagine the labels you give yourself.
minus-square@Ensign_CrablinkEnglish1•3 months ago Being called a “centerist” always makes me laugh Sorry. When Vichy Democrats don’t get their very first choice, they form PACs to elect Republicans.
And the national convention hasn’t happened yet. He’s not officially the candidate until appointed at the convention.
I guess the point is that to replace Biden would drive chaos that would last longer than 4 months and be self defeating.
Biden is self defeating. I don’t see how he can win at this point. 2020 was pretty close.
Then just resign yourself to Trump winning, and spend the next years whining.
Or push to have another nominee, one who can beat the extremely unpopular republican.
Slipping a new nominee in has the result of chaos. But, if you consider that chaos will not be a problem, then you don’t remember Eagleton.
Sounds to me like chaos is a threat and not a prediction.
When centrists don’t get their very first choice, they form PACs to elect Republicans.
Being called a “centerist” always makes me laugh. I can just imagine the labels you give yourself.
Sorry. When Vichy Democrats don’t get their very first choice, they form PACs to elect Republicans.
Any more brilliant political insight?