• @Cosmonauticus
    link
    English
    36 months ago

    Personally I dont see the difference. (I do see the difference between probation and supervised release now). It essentially claims a prisoner (incarcerated or on supervised release) has no freedom of speech.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Right or wrong, the whole point of incarceration is removing freedoms as punitive punishment for committing crimes.

      Probation, supervised release, it’s not the same as having served the sentence (and therefore gaining most rights back,). For example, a pedophile is probably going to never be allowed to work around kids and doing so on probation or sup. release is going to see them sent back into jail.

      • @Cosmonauticus
        link
        English
        06 months ago

        It’s wrong. Incarceration doesn’t mean you lose your citizenship and citizens of the US are still entitled to basic rights such as speech. Prisoners supposedly have rights that protect them from the state.

        We should all be more upset about this

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Prisoners have rights? As the last constitutionally protected form of slaves?

          And yes. It’s wrong.

          I just think if we solve the larger problem this won’t be an issue.

          • @Cosmonauticus
            link
            English
            26 months ago

            Prisoners still have the rights of the 1st, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th amendments. They are many cases of prisoners successfully sueing for having those rights violated.

            We shouldn’t act like they don’t exist simply because some of the powers that be want to pretend they don’t

        • Carighan Maconar
          link
          English
          16 months ago

          You do realize though that freedom of speech does not mean freedom to say whatever you want, yes?