• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -15 months ago

    its not ive forgotten but my brain just made my memories get forgotten. but i havent forgotten lets get that straight

    and if it is just water, why go through all the trouble of convincing that it isnt wet? feels we are just arguing the meaning of the word wet and not the word that can describe water the best (which is wet)

    • EleventhHour
      link
      1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      its not ive forgotten but my brain just made my memories get forgotten. but i havent forgotten lets get that straight

      So… you didn’t forget… your brain forgot? lol

      And I’m not trying to convince you of anything— I’m just correcting you. It’s you who have been trying all the convincing with your logical fallacies, acting like water is the same as fire or sugar. Then I have to correct you again by informing you that water is not sugar or fire. I’ve had to do that more than once now.

      Since you are so confused, I suggest you take a rest. Water isn’t wet. It just makes things wet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -15 months ago

        water is wet. because it makes things wet. and you seem to not grasp what a comparison is either. i never said fire or sugar was water i was comparing your logic to something else

        and my first point is basically what is being said about water “not being wet” it is yet another comparison, as in i didnt forget my brain made me forget. water isnt wet it just makes things wet. comparison

        • EleventhHour
          link
          15 months ago

          One again, I must correct you and - apparently - your brain that makes you forget things.

          Water is not wet; it just makes things wet. The transitive property of math does not apply to water because water is not math. (Another thing water is not).

          You seem increasingly confused, blaming your “brain” for your mistakes. I suggest giving your “brain” a nice rest.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -15 months ago

            once again, i must say it was a comparison. i do not know why you take it so literal. water is wet because it makes things wet

            • EleventhHour
              link
              1
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Once again, it’s a false equivalence logical fallacy— neither sugar nor fire are water, and there is no reason to believe they would act like water. Especially considering that water is not wet, it just makes things wet.

              This seems to be causing you quite a bit of distress and memory problems. I suggest a rest.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -15 months ago

                what makes water so special that it absolutely under any circumstances never be compared to anything else? the fact that its wet?

                • EleventhHour
                  link
                  25 months ago

                  I see you’re still confused. Water isn’t wet; it just makes things wet.

                  And water isn’t special, either. It can be compared to lots of things— just not falsely, as you have.

                  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -15 months ago

                    i havent falsely compared water. and i am not confused. it is pretty obvious if youve been around water that it is wet