@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzimagemessage-square148fedilinkarrow-up1950arrow-down151cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1899arrow-down1imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square148fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-26 months agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?