@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • 3 months ago"Suffering builds character". anarcho-primitivists, probablyslrpnk.netimagemessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up1546arrow-down194
arrow-up1452arrow-down1image"Suffering builds character". anarcho-primitivists, probablyslrpnk.net@[email protected] to solarpunk [email protected] • 3 months agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•3 months agoCertainly, but those are the wealthy regions, which don’t really fit into the “developing” stage anymore imo. They’re more developed than the (mainland) UK was when the terminology became common.
minus-squarepoVoqlinkfedilink2•3 months agoYes, but in a hypothetical world where Mexico was part of the US, the per capital consumption of the US would also look much better on paper.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•3 months agoI think we agree, lol. Richer areas use more resources and poorer areas use fewer. It’s not 1:1, but it’s pretty close.
Certainly, but those are the wealthy regions, which don’t really fit into the “developing” stage anymore imo. They’re more developed than the (mainland) UK was when the terminology became common.
Yes, but in a hypothetical world where Mexico was part of the US, the per capital consumption of the US would also look much better on paper.
I think we agree, lol. Richer areas use more resources and poorer areas use fewer. It’s not 1:1, but it’s pretty close.