I only just thought of this. I have the same cartoon-y profile pic from a foreign TV show on a bunch of my accounts, I wonder if its unique enough and worth tracking.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I don’t think they use picture analyzing software for tracking. It’s very resource heavy because it uses systems similar to LLMs. You can make very slight changes to your pfp (just one changed pixel is enough) for every website to avoid hash match but it’s not necessary I think. If someone wants to manually find your accounts though then it won’t be too hard for them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        Yes but I think most of them use absolutely the same transformation so the resulting image is the same. I really can be wrong though.

        • @WhatAmLemmy
          link
          English
          25 months ago

          Nah they don’t. I uploaded the exact same pic to a bunch of different work profiles (slack, google, microsoft). I inspected them out of curiosity and they were all different sizes and resolutions.

            • @WhatAmLemmy
              link
              English
              14 months ago

              You should still worry about it for manual association. I rarely use them outside work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        That works too but then the image will be the resolution of a Minetest texture after uploading.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          no i mean downscaling and quantising before taking the hash to be able to reliably get the same hash for images that have been compressed, downscaled, had individual pixels edited, etc

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            Oh that’s smart but I don’t think they use it for tracking now. The most they can do is check the hash for known CSAM.