Nemeski to [email protected] • 6 months agoSignal under fire for storing encryption keys in plaintextstackdiary.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down119cross-posted to: [email protected]privacy[email protected]technology[email protected]
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkSignal under fire for storing encryption keys in plaintextstackdiary.comNemeski to [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square16fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]privacy[email protected]technology[email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•6 months agoDoesn’t… doesn’t then OpenSSH client store keys in text files? I’m trying to figure out how this is an issue, other than maybe Signal should be using an OS level keystore.
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)linkfedilinkEnglish1•6 months agoThey are text files but they are not “plaintext”. They are (optionally) encrypted with a user-supplied password. That is why you need ssh-agent to stay sane.
Doesn’t… doesn’t then OpenSSH client store keys in text files?
I’m trying to figure out how this is an issue, other than maybe Signal should be using an OS level keystore.
They are text files but they are not “plaintext”. They are (optionally) encrypted with a user-supplied password. That is why you need
ssh-agentto stay sane.