• @kellyaster
    link
    21 month ago

    Oh jeez, it’s coming back to me now. Yikes, what a terrible use of classnames. I’m sure they thought they had a good reason for it, but to me it’s kind of a failure of a feature implementation if most of your userbase ends up not just ignoring it but outright deleting it because it’s useless to them and just creates clutter.

    Dreamweaver did have one saving grace. It had this code editor cleanup mode that removed empty and redundant tags, and at one point they added a neat option to remove Word document tags! From what I remember, it was pretty accurate and helped clean up a lot of shit. Unfortunately, it was unable to clean up code that it created itself.

    • @shyguyblue
      link
      31 month ago

      Ahhh! I had a client a hundred years ago that did a “save as webpage” from a Word doc and wanted me to clean it up… I’m like, “it’ll be easier to throw it out and start over”, so that’s what i did. Then i charged her for the time it would have taken, had i bothered to try and clean up the code. She was happy to pay it!?

      • @kellyaster
        link
        21 month ago

        Argh! Yeah, sometimes it’s better to start over than try to fix it. All those weirdass classes and bizarrely nested divs, screw that hahah