• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I was being sarcastic, tbh. I’m happy to see this (I use Linux everywhere), but I’m realistic. 3% doesn’t look super impressive. I’m not sure where the line would be, though. 10%?

    • Lengsel
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      I would guess Linux desktop means nothing until it gets close to 15% for software developers to include a Linux version for new software releases, of any kind or type of software.

      I do PC gaming and I only use Windows on that one gaming computer, so I can play any and all games, and have the best graphics hardware performance.

      All of my other computers are only a mix of BSD and Linux, but for playing games I’m not willing to use anything other than Windows.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        It seems to have grown enough that software like Zoom, MS Teams, Webex and Teamviewer all have versions available for the various linux OSs. If the market was so tiny no software developer would want to release these and handle bug reports, and fixes. It would just not viable. So there must be enough of a base that this is needed.

        • Lengsel
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Yes, I know there is a market, as tiny as it is. Imagine how much further along corporate software for Linux would be if there was a single format for installing all software in a default configuration for a fresh Linux install.

          I genuinelly don’t understand why Linus never develeped a universal installer like .dmg, .msi, .exe, for Linux.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            He was focused on the kernel, not the OS part unfortunately. Maybe Snap, Flatpak or AppImage will rise to the top for default install. For now I run OpenSUSE which has 1 click installer for rpms, probably as close to msi or exe there is right now.