• @Carrolade
    link
    English
    12 months ago

    I think even poor sources should be included in an automated aggregator like this. It’s not trying to feed us any form of the truth. It’s showing us everything that is out there, from the blatant propaganda to the respectable journalism, and everything in between.

    I do not use ground news to find out the truth. I use it to see what is being said. All of what is being said. I have my own methods for determining factuality, I don’t want a bot to do it for me.

      • @Carrolade
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        Again, I don’t want a bot to determine what is or is not true. I want it to collect everything people are saying and put it all in one spot. Are some people somewhere publishing something on the topic, true or false? Sometimes I want to see it.

        I want to know what everyone’s stance is, everyone’s messaging, even everyone’s lies, all in one convenient spot.

        Look at it as a propaganda monitoring service if you prefer, that happens to include genuine journalism as well, since it cannot tell the difference.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Wanting a bot to promote verifiably false information is fucked up. Wanting a bot to conflate multiple separate stories into one narrative is fucked up.

          You and I may be fine with easily observing falsities but it has become readily apparent over the past 20+ years that literal fake news is having a measurable and long term impact on our society and planet. I fully agree that having access to multiple perspectives is fantastic and we should all want that. The issue is that this particular platform goes well beyond that.

          Most humans are not intelligent enough to understand what they’re reading even when they are told what they’re reading is inaccurate https://lemmy.ml/post/17790884/12168067