• @Cryophilia
    link
    -35 months ago

    and their opinions are not reflective or representative of anything

    Are you serious? The vast majority of the voting age citizenry are ignoramuses.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      I am serious that anecdotal evidence is not statistically significant and that, therefore, one random child is not representative of anything

      • @Cryophilia
        link
        -15 months ago

        If you only look at each individual tree as a tree, you’ll fail to realize you’re in a forest.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          24 months ago

          So if the above person was familiar with Whitmer then I should presume that most people also are?

          Your points aren’t making sense. Anecdotal evidence gathered from a non-American child’s comments on a random post on a fringe STEM-lord website is not representative of anything.

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            -24 months ago

            Jesus you people are insufferable. Not knowing about Whitmer is a single anecdote that is consistent with a trend that is quite obvious and so help me god if you do that sealioning bullshit demanding a peer reviewed study about Whitmers name recognition

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              14 months ago

              consistent with a trend that is quite obvious

              What trend?

              sealioning

              Using terms like this makes one sound socially maladjusted. Which makes sense given the site we’re on. Which reinforces my point that a random comment has no representative value - people on here are STEM-brained weirdos or are bots. Either way, not exactly representative of the median adult US voter