• @Cypher
    link
    English
    -111 month ago

    90 decibels is about as loud as a truck driving past or a (legal, not stupid noisy) motorcycle from 4-5 metres away at 70% rpm.

    If they’re more than 500 metres away this would be a slight annoyance at worst.

    The article mentions studies but doesn’t link any. It uses one doctor as a reputable source but we know doctors can fall for conspiracy theories like anyone else.

    This sounds like the anti-wind farm idiots who claim all sorts of health issues but ONLY after they’ve read about these health issues from conspiracy theories.

    The nocebo effect is real, these people might be suffering, but I have serious doubts the cause is actually some air conditioning… which is what will cause the noise from data centres.

    • @Schmuppes
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      90 decibels is about as loud as a truck driving past or a (legal, not stupid noisy) motorcycle from 4-5 metres away at 70% rpm.

      If they’re more than 500 metres away this would be a slight annoyance at worst.

      Yeah, but a motorcycle won’t drive past you non-stop and 24/7.

      • @Cypher
        link
        English
        -71 month ago

        There’s still zero evidence for these claims of mysterious health issues.

        People have lived with noise pollution before.

          • @Cypher
            link
            English
            01 month ago

            Thanks for yours. Clearly you contributed to the conversation by raising valid concerns about the story, regulations and the lead content of your pipes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          “People have lived with water pollution before”, he says, dumping a truckload of depleted uranium into the swimming pool.

        • @Schmuppes
          link
          English
          71 month ago

          Prolonged exposure to noise pollution is an unproven health risk? Yeah right.

          • @Cypher
            link
            English
            01 month ago

            The reported health issues don’t align with understood examples of long term exposure to noise pollution.

            The studies the article claims exist don’t seem to.

            A single doctor is not a consensus.

            Be more critical with your thinking or you might find yourself falling for anti-vax or flat earth nonsense.

            • @Schmuppes
              link
              English
              11 month ago

              A single doctor? It is, in fact, scientific consensus. And it has been for quite a while now.

              Noise pollution adversely affects the lives of millions of people. Studies have shown that there are direct links between noise and health. Problems related to noise include stress related illnesses, high blood pressure, speech interference, hearing loss, sleep disruption, and lost productivity. Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) is the most common and often discussed health effect, but research has shown that exposure to constant or high levels of noise can cause countless adverse health affects.

              You can read a bit about it, but I assume that’s not what you really want.

              • @Cypher
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                Neat that they don’t list half the ‘symptoms’ from the article!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      It’s not a conventional data center. It’s a bunch of containers containing mining hardware with giant fans blowing through them. This is obvious from the header image of the article.