contentbotB to Cool [email protected]English • 2 months agoA cool Guide to Film Popularity over the Yearsi.redd.itimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1140arrow-down18file-textstarcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
arrow-up1132arrow-down1imageA cool Guide to Film Popularity over the Yearsi.redd.itcontentbotB to Cool [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-textstarcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•2 months agoNormally that indicates that all the x axis are the same. If that’s not true here, then that’s an issue. But I don’t see any indication that it’s not. arrow-up18arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-squareRentlarlinkfedilinkEnglish11•2 months agoThe axis being so far away, even if they are all the same, makes it difficult for the reader to line up where the peaks are, though some are easy to get from contextual clues (~1945 for War movies for example). arrow-up111arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoYeah. Good point. I’ve seen this with just two stacked graphs and not minded. But it makes the trends in the top graphs here pretty inaccessible. arrow-up11arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
Normally that indicates that all the x axis are the same. If that’s not true here, then that’s an issue. But I don’t see any indication that it’s not.
The axis being so far away, even if they are all the same, makes it difficult for the reader to line up where the peaks are, though some are easy to get from contextual clues (~1945 for War movies for example).
Yeah. Good point. I’ve seen this with just two stacked graphs and not minded. But it makes the trends in the top graphs here pretty inaccessible.