• 1 Post
  • 176 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • RustyEarthfiretoPolitical Memesdemocrats got this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    7 bills have passed the Senate, one has been signed into law: Congress.gov search

    (note: the filter doesn’t include bills starting in the House, but there aren’t any relevant ones)

    Also, the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025” and “Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act” were “filibustered” (failed to reach cloture).











  • Thanks for the link and breakdown.

    It sounds like a better description of the estimated thinking speed would be 5-50 bits per second. And when summarizing capacity/capability, one generally uses a number near the top end. It makes far more sense to say we are capable of 50 bps but often use less, than to say we are only capable of 10 but sometimes do more than we are capable of doing. And the paper leans hard into 10 bps being a internally imposed limit rather than conditional, going as far as saying a neural-computer interface would be limited to this rate.

    “Thinking speed” is also a poor description for input/output measurement, akin to calling a monitor’s bitrate the computer’s FLOPS.

    Visual processing is multi-faceted. I definitely don’t think all of vision can be reduced to 50bps, but maybe the serial part after the parallel bits have done stuff like detecting lines, arcs, textures, areas of contrast, etc.