A bipartisan group of senators reached a deal Wednesday on legislation to ban stock trading by members of Congress, setting the bill up for action in the Senate later this month.

  • @dogslayeggs
    link
    781 month ago

    Bill dies in committee in 3, 2, 1…

    • @CaptainSpaceman
      link
      501 month ago

      Or allows their spouses to trade

      Or has zero teeth

      Etc

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        381 month ago

        From the article:

        The deal would immediately prohibit members of Congress from buying stocks and selling stocks 90 days after the bill is signed into law.

        It would also ban member spouses and dependent children from trading stocks starting in March 2027. Penalties for violating the law would either be the monthly salary of a lawmaker or 10% of the value of each asset they buy or sell.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            Most taxes on asset sale is based on profit, subtracting the bought price from the sold price. Given the wording the tax would be on the sale price, not the profit.

                • @NOT_RICK
                  link
                  English
                  41 month ago

                  More than pretty good, and certainly enough to accrue a million plus in assets over the span of a career.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                21 month ago

                But they sure do with their insider trading.

        • @CaptainSpaceman
          link
          71 month ago

          Sounds like zero teeth to me if the fine is just “the cost of doing business”

        • I Cast Fist
          link
          fedilink
          51 month ago

          Spouses and dependent children only? Then it’s time to call mom and dad! Also brother, sister, cousin, uncle, etc.

        • @webhead
          link
          -21 month ago

          AFTER BEING SIGNED INTO LAW seems like a huge loophole to me. They can just trade while they’re talking about it or right after it passes but hasn’t been signed, etc etc.

          • @jacksilver
            link
            121 month ago

            That’s how laws work. You can’t generally make something illegal retroactively, otherwise you could change the law to persecute anyone you want.

            How would you want them to approach it?

            • @webhead
              link
              11 month ago

              I dunno maybe they should be subject to more stringent rules like people at banks and such? If you can just trade your stocks right before you pass a law, what’s the point of the new rule? That’s part of why they’re under fire in the first place isn’t it? They have insider information. Saying you can’t trade after the fact seems like it’s too late to me. Maybe I didn’t explain that well idk.

              • @jacksilver
                link
                21 month ago

                I understand your point, but that’s what this law would theoritcally accomplish. It would limit representatives/senators from being able to trade stocks (a higher standard than an average citizen). While they can buy/sell stocks before the law, that’s just the current state of affairs.

                Regarding the timing of trades, etc. The value of their insider knowledge is really only beneficial over long periods of time. Yes they could buy/sell stock in the interim, but preventing it long term would be an actual win.

                • @webhead
                  link
                  11 month ago

                  I don’t disagree with you. Progress is progress. I just wish it was more.