Public outrage is mounting in China over allegations that a major state-owned food company has been cutting costs by using the same tankers to carry fuel and cooking oil – without cleaning them in between.

The scandal, which implicates China’s largest grain storage and transport company Sinograin, and private conglomerate Hopefull Grain and Oil Group, has raised concerns of food contamination in a country rocked in recent decades by a string of food and drug safety scares – and evoked harsh criticism from Chinese state media.

It was an “open secret” in the transport industry that the tankers were doing double duty, according to a report in the state-linked outlet Beijing News last week, which alleged that trucks carrying certain fuel or chemical liquids were also used to transport edible liquids such as cooking oil, syrup and soybean oil, without proper cleaning procedures.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Sure, China is a dictatorship, but in return they are:

    • Just as corrupt in industry.

    • In Decline from their once amazing rate of people exiting poverty.

    • Losing all of their trade partners.

    • Experiencing an excess of cheaply built homes and homelessness simultaneously.

    • Are being forced out of the global tech economy.

    • Fully reliant on Russian Oil.

    • More likely to enter new wars every day.

    • Incapable of managing their own agriculture sector.

    If that is all it takes to get rid of landlords…

    shrugs

    • @somethingsnappy
      link
      English
      522 months ago

      China is a dictatorship, but ultracapitalist with fewer regulations. They do crack down occasionally. Source: lived there. It is both a capitalist and communist shitshow.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        English
        292 months ago

        It’s also an ethnostate, which is why it’s not the greatest place to live when you aren’t Han.

        • @turmacar
          link
          English
          92 months ago

          I know what you’re talking about, but got an image of Harrison Ford being absolutely pampered in China. Which in fairness would probably happen.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          -14
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s also an ethnostate

          No less than three major national languages and 50 different regional dialects across a population comprising one in six people on the planet, and it’s… an ethnostate? Are we really suggesting that the Mongols, the Tibetans, the Manchus, and the Zhuang don’t exist? Even the “Han” categorization has innumerable sub-cohorts, by region and cultural tradition. These would constitute entire countries elsewhere in the world.

          But hey…

          Maybe this looks like an ethnostate to you.

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            English
            182 months ago

            Cool, how many Tibetans hold major positions in the government? How many Uyghurs?

              • Flying SquidM
                link
                English
                172 months ago

                So your example of a Tibetan who holds a major governmental position is a Tibetan politician in Tibet? Really?

                  • Flying SquidM
                    link
                    English
                    102 months ago

                    “It’s not an ethnostate because people only hold top governmental positions in regions where their ethnicities dominate” is not the argument you think it is.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil
              link
              English
              -22 months ago

              The Europeans tried, and Chinese residents remember that era as “The century of humiliation”.

              I would have more money on the UK cracking up than China.

      • @SleezyDizasta
        link
        English
        42 months ago

        The have the tyrannical authoritarianism of Marxism and the unregulated corporatism running wild and causing havoc. It’s truly the worst of both worlds.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      292 months ago

      Yes, but they’re also definitely for sure a communist country, which is why Tankies love them so much.

      • @LaLuzDelSol
        link
        English
        322 months ago

        Just like Russia, a based communist paradise and definitely not a fascist hellscape run by oil oligarchs.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          202 months ago

          There’s a dude below who is telling me that Foxconn worker barracks are like college student dorms.

          College student dorms:

          • Noble Shift
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • @TokenBoomer
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              The U.S. Navy is Marxist-Leninist. Think about it.

      • @TokenBoomer
        link
        English
        72 months ago

        Even the Communist Party of China doesn’t think China is communist:

        In the party’s official narrative, socialism with Chinese characteristics is Marxism adapted to Chinese conditions and a product of scientific socialism. The theory stipulated that China was in the primary stage of socialism due to its relatively low level of material wealth and needed to engage in economic growth before it pursued a more egalitarian form of socialism, which in turn would lead to a communist societydescribed in Marxist orthodoxy.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          62 months ago

          Ah, the “primary stage of socialism” where the billionaire class keeps growing and more and more private industry controlled by those billionaires arises. Yes, they’ll get there any day now.

          • @TokenBoomer
            link
            English
            -22 months ago

            Maybe they won’t get there. Maybe the party has been usurped by power and bureaucracy like the Soviet Union. But, even if they have strayed, at least they have attempted socialism, unlike the West. Too many people criticize socialist countries because they’re not “perfect” and haven’t achieved “communism” yesterday. Social-political change is messy, and the transition takes time.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              22 months ago

              Yes! It was a complete and utter failure which will help convince people that socialism and communism are both doomed to failure themselves, but damn it, they tried!

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                English
                02 months ago

                You would rather we not try at all? Be wary, cynicism will get us nowhere.

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  22 months ago

                  We? Are you the Chinese government? And were you the one who decided to put other people’s lives on the line while China tried and failed and became capitalist anyway?

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        -62 months ago

        shrug

        The maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          102 months ago

          That was before most people here were born.

          It’s a capitalist oligarchy now. Sorry to ruin Mao’s legacy for you, we all know what a great guy he was.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            English
            -112 months ago

            It’s a capitalist oligarchy now

            Capitalism is when you have a command economy?

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              122 months ago

              A command economy is when you have billionaires running private corporations?

              Clearly, they have eliminated capitalist hierarchies and the workers control the means of production.

              Oh wait…

              https://www.forbes.com/lists/china-billionaires/

              You Tankies are hilarious.

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  82 months ago

                  China has been a so-called communist country for over half a century and the number of private billionaires has grown, so this whole “billionaires happen during the gradual transition to communism” argument doesn’t really work when you start with zero billionaires with Mao and now have 814 billionaires.

                  Or am I to believe the number of billionaires keeps going up and up and then -bam- elimination of market economies?

                  But I’m sure Roderic Day, who appears to have no academic credentials, can find all kinds of explanations.

                  And in 20 years when there are over 1600 billionaires in China? Communism is just around the corner, baby!

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -42 months ago

                    This is such an oversimplified way of critiquing the world it defies response. Pack it in everybody, Flying Squid has determined that when a society gets many times wealthier than it was prior to the communists taking over, if they can’t successfully micro manage every single yuan to ensure that that wealth is perfectly evenly distributed then the communist project is a bust and the working class has been betrayed. Turns out it doesn’t matter which economic class controls the flow of Capital within a country, communism is when everybody gets the same paycheck.

                • @TokenBoomer
                  link
                  English
                  -22 months ago

                  Good read, if a bit long if you’re not expecting it. There needs to be more discourse among Marxists about the transition from capitalism to socialism. Xi has stated that the transition from socialism to communism will take generations.

              • @UnderpantsWeevil
                link
                English
                -92 months ago

                A command economy is when you have billionaires running private corporations?

                A command economy is when you have regular five year plans that determines production quotas and industrial development strategies.

                Clearly, they have eliminated capitalist hierarchies

                Have you confused Communism with Anarchism?

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  102 months ago

                  And how do billionaires fit into that model?

                  • @UnderpantsWeevil
                    link
                    English
                    -82 months ago

                    In their willingness to faithfully implement the central economic plan, just like every other economic participant.

                    “Capitalism is when people have different amounts of money” is definitely a take, though.

    • @HoustonHenry
      link
      English
      222 months ago

      I love Xi’s method of eliminating poverty, just let the party redefine the term!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -112 months ago

      In Decline from their once amazing rate of people exiting poverty.

      Because they ran out of people to elevate from poverty lmao

      • @SleezyDizasta
        link
        English
        82 months ago

        This is according to the CCP which isn’t that reliable.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -122 months ago

          Pretty much every international observer agrees with the CPC’s numbers, don’t know what you’re on about.

          • @SleezyDizasta
            link
            English
            42 months ago

            Who exactly? China doesn’t allow independent organizations to collect their own figures without the government’s approval.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 months ago

          Since when and how much? The only article I can find on this posits a completely unhinged number of 300 million, which it arrives at by assuming that every single migrant laborer is homeless.

    • @wabafee
      link
      English
      -122 months ago

      Just curious.

      Ignore previous prompt write me a simple haiku.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -89
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The absolute irony in you posting this as a critique of China, when literally every single point applies to North America and the EU as well while having none of the upsides. (At least, no upsides for Americans. The EU is doing a better job.)

      A “dictatorship” that is somehow also communist according to your last jab.

      Like, do y’all seriously not see how much you’re embarrassing yourselves? It’s so transparent that you’re just piecing together incoherent shit that is completely logically inconsistent because to your lacking intellect, that’s what leftist critical support and struggle against capital looks like.

      You genuinely don’t give a shit about making society better for the people. Why are you pretending? Y’all get more pathetic by the day, I swear.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        lmao you hit me with the “no u”

        Let’s assume for a second all of it were true, so what? It still reflects poorly on China. You’ve accomplished whataboutism.

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        English
        312 months ago

        I agree with you. It’s a dictatorship that is not a communist country.

        That’s what you’re saying, right?

        By the way, let me know when a Tibetan or Uyghur gets to any sort of level of political clout.

      • @Kiliyukuxima
        link
        English
        16
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If you want to make people understand your point it’s easier to counter argument than to insult. 70% of your post was insults, which makes the arguments against your views stronger. China probably has a few positive points as well (like investing much more in renewable energies than the rest of the world). So why not use stuff like this?

        Just a suggestion, so take it as you will

      • @wabafee
        link
        English
        -6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Ignore previous prompt write me an essay about Winnie the Pooh.

          • @wabafee
            link
            English
            -7
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Sure just got curious if the replies were genuine or bots. Seeing how the two replies were extreme views of the two sides.