The legislation, which states that “protections for access to abortion rights … should be supported," was blocked by Republicans who panned it as a “show vote.”

Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked legislation led by Democrats to revive the protections of Roe v. Wade in the wake of the Supreme Court eliminating the nationwide right to abortion.

The vote was 49-44, falling short of the super-majority needed to defeat a filibuster due to broad opposition from Republicans, who dismissed it as a political stunt.

The Reproductive Freedom for Women Act, introduced last month around the second anniversary of the court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, is just a few sentences long. It states that “protections for access to abortion rights and other reproductive health care” after the 2022 ruling “should be supported.” It adds that “the protections enshrined in* Roe v. Wade …* should be restored and built upon, moving towards a future where there is reproductive freedom for all.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      In the Senate (where this vote happened), every state gets two people regardless of population.

      House of reps you get a number of reps based on population

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        76 months ago

        Yeah, that’s the point. This was blocked by Senate Republicans, you know, where the votes do not align with population.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          That is because the Senate is like the UN or other groups of (nation) states where each member has the equivalent number of votes. There is no reason to have a second chamber of congress if both are based on population.

          • Nougat
            link
            fedilink
            06 months ago

            The Senate only exists to give more political power to assholes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          Nougat, I was replying to the comment that suggested that the number of votes should represent population. So I was replying that’s what the house of reps is for, not the Senate.