The legislation, which states that “protections for access to abortion rights … should be supported," was blocked by Republicans who panned it as a “show vote.”

Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked legislation led by Democrats to revive the protections of Roe v. Wade in the wake of the Supreme Court eliminating the nationwide right to abortion.

The vote was 49-44, falling short of the super-majority needed to defeat a filibuster due to broad opposition from Republicans, who dismissed it as a political stunt.

The Reproductive Freedom for Women Act, introduced last month around the second anniversary of the court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, is just a few sentences long. It states that “protections for access to abortion rights and other reproductive health care” after the 2022 ruling “should be supported.” It adds that “the protections enshrined in* Roe v. Wade …* should be restored and built upon, moving towards a future where there is reproductive freedom for all.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In the Senate (where this vote happened), every state gets two people regardless of population.

    House of reps you get a number of reps based on population

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      Yeah, that’s the point. This was blocked by Senate Republicans, you know, where the votes do not align with population.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        That is because the Senate is like the UN or other groups of (nation) states where each member has the equivalent number of votes. There is no reason to have a second chamber of congress if both are based on population.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          02 months ago

          The Senate only exists to give more political power to assholes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Nougat, I was replying to the comment that suggested that the number of votes should represent population. So I was replying that’s what the house of reps is for, not the Senate.