Nato members have pledged their support for an “irreversible path” to future membership for Ukraine, as well as more aid.

While a formal timeline for it to join the military alliance was not agreed at a summit in Washington DC, the military alliance’s 32 members said they had “unwavering” support for Ukraine’s war effort.

Nato has also announced further integration with Ukraine’s military and members have committed €40bn ($43.3bn, £33.7bn) in aid in the next year, including F-16 fighter jets and air defence support.

The bloc’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said: “Support to Ukraine is not charity - it is in our own security interest.”

  • @hark
    link
    English
    -561 month ago

    The US is objectively more of an aggressor. Where’s the NATO equivalent for fighting them off? Oh right, dismantled, stomped on, and now taking victory laps around it.

      • @hark
        link
        English
        -171 month ago

        Because the US has the means to work behind the scenes. Invasions are a crude tool which can be avoided when you can simply infiltrate the country with agents paying people off from within the country. Of course, this requires a sophisticated intelligence apparatus and isn’t possible for most countries.

          • @hark
            link
            English
            -121 month ago

            Tell me, what do you think the CIA does? Are you aware of their history? Do you think they just sit around with their thumb up their ass now? Sorry to see that you consider applying basic logic a mental workout.

              • @irreticent
                link
                English
                71 month ago

                Keep feeding the troll and there’ll be troll shit all over the lawn.

                • @hark
                  link
                  English
                  -61 month ago

                  True, I shouldn’t feed the troll who thinks all intelligence agencies are on the same level as the CIA.

                  • @irreticent
                    link
                    English
                    31 month ago

                    Wait. You actually…

                    I’m sorry if I was rude, but self-deception is a process of denying or rationalizing away the relevance, significance, or importance of opposing evidence and logical argument. Self-deception involves convincing oneself of a truth (or lack of truth) so that one does not reveal any self-knowledge of the deception.

    • @Squizzy
      link
      English
      141 month ago

      Im no defender of the US but they are not actively expanding into neighbouring territory. And there is nothing stopping Russia approaching Canada and Mexico about a military alliance, except the reality of the how absurd it is.

      • @hamid
        link
        English
        -3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        deleted by creator

      • @hark
        link
        English
        -131 month ago

        There is no need to overtly expand into a neighbouring territory when you can already exert sufficient influence with “soft” power. Russia doesn’t have the means to pay off Canada or Mexico to switch sides like the US does with Ukraine.

        • @Squizzy
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          That soft power being mutual growth and societal progress?

          Russia cant offer similar because they are a cancer.