• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -142 months ago

    Except the creator is a major douche who took advantage of his sleazy SEO skills to make it prolific.

        • @PunnyName
          link
          11
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Ok, that’s literally a bad website, and they criticize him for bad art. I’m no graphic designer, but they should higher one. And the “source” is just another sourceless statement.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -12 months ago

            That’s not the only site talking about him, but it was convenient to find and touched on everything.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              72 months ago

              Hilarious.

              “This site is trash and makes tons of unsourced claims.”

              “Well, this is only ONE of the MYRIAD sites I COULD have given you. It was somehow more “convenient” for me to give you this one than any of the other reputable sites to which I’m referring.”

        • @Brkdncr
          link
          62 months ago

          Dang someone takes art criticism to a new level.

    • topher
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      So, dude makes art on the internet and wanted to use his output to create a revenue stream for himself? Shocking, how dare he. Randall Munroe got popular doing xkcd, and now he’s written books just to further make a name for himself. A damning indictment.