A California-based startup called Savor has figured out a unique way to make a butter alternative that doesn’t involve livestock, plants, or even displacing land. Their butter is produced from synthetic fat made using carbon dioxide and hydrogen, and the best part is —- it tastes just like regular butter.

  • sunzu
    link
    fedilink
    -782 months ago

    Fake food is going to be more healthy than the real deal?

    Sure buddy

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        -452 months ago

        It is also a fact that butter is a staple food that has been used for thousands of years with a proven track record.

          • sunzu
            link
            fedilink
            -402 months ago

            Just because something is fallacy the way it was presented does not make it wrong if he facts check out :)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              43
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Your facts don’t check out, that’s what makes you wrong. Fallacies are just the symptom.

              • sunzu
                link
                fedilink
                -31
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Is butter not the best product in its class? both from health ie nutrition value and taste perspective?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  26
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Not anymore. This product matches butter on both counts and puts out much less pollution and takes up much less land than factory farming. I urge you to actually read the article, many of your points are addressed within.

                  • sunzu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -252 months ago

                    I am just going with ol realiable

                    y’all have fun testing another “product”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          72 months ago

          This may be a logical fallacy known as false equivalence, when one fact is stated or implied to be conflated with another not directly related fact.

    • @Omega_Man
      link
      222 months ago

      They said it’s NOT made to be more healthy.

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        -422 months ago

        It won’t be, it’s processed shite

        • Fushuan [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          So is any meat, mayonnaise, even butter is processed. Ever went into a fast food chain? Most ingredients are processed to the bits.

          You better not take any medicine, that super processed? And Coca cola or any energy drinks? Bleh, made in labs!

          I guess you only eat whole grains collected by you, that must suck.

          • sunzu
            link
            fedilink
            02 months ago

            Dam y’all really getting bent on shape over this lol

    • @disguy_ovaheaOP
      link
      19
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I wrote it’s not made to be more healthy, because that’s the current marketing of butter alternatives. This isn’t claiming to be more healthy. The compounds are the same as the fatty acids in butter.

      It’s simply a way to get butter while reducing carbon dioxide, rather than increasing it.

    • Deebster
      link
      fedilink
      182 months ago

      If it’s chemically identical, what does it matter if it’s come from dairy, this process, or a Star Trek replicator?

    • @eatthecake
      link
      32 months ago

      It’s not made to be more healthy, just more planet friendly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      02 months ago

      Good or bad, it’s still processed food.

      That’s my half-assed neutral statement. I choose not to eat processed foods. As long as there’s disclosure, I don’t care.

      What people eat or don’t eat is their business.