GoDaddy really lived up to its bad reputation and recently changed their API rules. The rules are simple: either you own 10 (or 50) domains, you pay $20/month, or you don’t get the API. I personally didn’t get any communication, and this broke my DDNS setup. I am clearly not the only one judging from what I found online. A company this big gating an API behind such a steep price… So I will repeat what many people said before me (being right): don’t. use. GoDaddy.

    • thejevans
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      Sounds good. Better free DNS option with API support?

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        Desec.io is a good option. To be honest using cloudflare just for DNS is completely OK. It’s not a service that allows spying on you or consolidates their monopoly.

        • thejevans
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          It does, but for the same reason as what happened to OP, it’s best to separate DNS from domain registrar.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -105 months ago

        Don’t use DNS like that. Use a VPS and route traffic to a isolated network at home if need be

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          65 months ago

          ?? Your solution to dynamic dns is to run all the traffic through a static IP vps? Are you paying for this VPS, or are you saying you trust the host more than you trust cloudflare, because they give you a free VPS?

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -25 months ago

            I pay for a VPS and a static IP for the VPS. Way safer and less fragile

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              34 months ago

              Safer is a matter of opinion. You’re moving your trust from one company to another, that doesn’t necessarily equate more safety. How do you trust the safety of companies?

              As for less fragile, that is patently untrue. You have all the same failure points as previous, but now must manage the update schedule of another server, and have the added reliance on a third party host. You’ve increased fragility if anything.

        • thejevans
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          That’s definitely a nice solution, but I have not had good luck with free VPS providers keeping the lights on. It would likely cost money on the order of $5 to $10 per month, so it is a different class of solution.