• mozz
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    1. Polls are bullshit anyway, for a couple different reasons
    2. Biden is 3 POINTS UP nationally in a recent NYT poll which is why the doomsayers all of a sudden switched to caring about swing states just now
    3. Polls are bullshit anyway. He could be 15 points down for all we know, in the actual if-election-was-held-today counting. Nate Silver who had a pretty credible claim to cutting through all the math and bad methodology into a decent look at what’s going on gives Biden a 25% chance to win
    4. Nobody knows the future to be honest. Biden could fuck up worse than the debate at any time or anything could happen. There could be a mini civil war on Election Day as the Republicans try to cancel the results and people start fighting for real for what’s going to get written down as the outcome.
    5. FUCKING VOTE, register, sign up to do text banking. Volunteer to be a poll worker. Join up with a good little grouping; it might help the country and they tend to be good people and depending on how it goes after, it might save your life, too.

    John Connor said it. The future is not set. Until it happens, then it is. But that shit hasn’t happened yet.

    • @jordanlundM
      link
      19
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      National polls are meaningless because we don’t have national elections.

      If Trump is up in all 7 swing states, it doesn’t matter what 4 out of the 10 polled who happen to be in California or New York think.

      This is why the state by state polls are important .

      The “given” states, we already know.

      Washington, Oregon, California, etc. are all going to Biden, full stop.

      Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, etc. are all going to Trump, full stop.

      So knowing that, you poll the states that are in flux.

      Arizona - Trump +4

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

      Nevada - Trump +3 to +6

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

      New Mexico - Biden +1 (pre assassination att.)

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/new-mexico/

      Georgia - Trump +3 to +6 (+10 vs Harris)

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

      North Carolina - Trump +2 to +3

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/north-carolina/

      Pennsylvania - Trump +2 to +3 (+1 +2 vs Harris)

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/

      Michigan - Toss up, Trump +3 to Biden +1

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

      Wisconsin - Trump +2 (+1 vs Harris)

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

      Minnesota - Toss up - Trump +1 to Biden +2 (pre assassination att.)

      https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

      So you take that knowledge and plot it on the electoral college map:

      I’ve been following these state by state polls all year and this is the strongest showing for Trump yet.

      It went from Biden, to toss up, to Trump, to strong Trump, to this.

      Currently Biden does not have a path to win. Biden CANNOT lose PA, MI, WI. He HAS to have all three to be viable.

      • mozz
        link
        fedilink
        -25 months ago

        Well that’s an interesting comment

        I mean, yes, it’s true as far as it goes, and I would have thought that my point #3 would have sorta encompassed that idea and given a hint that I am aware on some level that it’s more complex than “whose line is higher in the most recent national poll = who’s going to win”.

        I have more I could say on it including what other recent swing state polls besides this one are saying, and underlying problems with the methodology including e.g. the absolute insanity of reporting polls of all registered voters as if likelihood to vote was not correlated with political affiliation when we already know that it is… but mostly I was just pointing out here, (a) keep in mind what the sudden shift of narrative here is implying about the bias of the poster (b) no fate, please vote.

        But now I have a more interesting question. If I look back in your history, will I find indications that you thought national level polls were important when Biden was behind, and now all of a sudden don’t care about them when Biden is ahead? ‘Cause that would be a super interesting (and to me unexpected) finding.

        • @jordanlundM
          link
          55 months ago

          I have been warning against national polls for years now, even pre-Lemmy. There are OTHER problems with polling, don’t even get me started on “likely” voters.

          But following these polls over time allows you to establish a trend line and right now, it’s trending Trump.

          That will change coming out of the Democratic convention, but then the question becomes “is it enough?” 🤷‍♂️ Guess we’ll find out!

          • mozz
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            Yeah, polls are crap but relative polling is like their one useful application. On that we agree

    • @anticolonialist
      link
      -15 months ago

      National polls are about as meaningless as our appendix. If the US conducted national elections via popular vote then they might actually mean something, but we don’t. Because of the electoral college, national polls mean nothing. And in all of the swing state polls, where polling matters, Biden is losing.

    • @RiccosuaveOP
      link
      -35 months ago

      Nate Silver who had a pretty credible claim to cutting through all the math and bad methodology into a decent look at what’s going on gives Biden a 25% chance to win.

      So even you admit using your own methodology that this election is going to be like shooting fish in a barrel for Trump. Got it 👍

      • mozz
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        It’s interesting to me that you’re not upset about that prediction. You sound happy about it.

        • @RiccosuaveOP
          link
          -25 months ago

          No matter how much you try to smuggle that intent onto my statements it won’t make it true. You’re neither a mind reader, nor a particularly effective advocate for your own arguments. Go take your piss poor use of unpersuasive rhetoric somewhere else.

          • mozz
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            What’s your feeling about Biden’s national polling?

            • @RiccosuaveOP
              link
              05 months ago

              As @jordanlund already said, national polling is meaningless because the popular vote does not determine the outcome of the election. I have not ever cared about national polling beyond the tertiary value of perhaps better understanding the aggregate sentiments of the country.

              • mozz
                link
                fedilink
                25 months ago

                Idk dude. A week ago you were insisting that swing state polling wasn’t what was important, it was something else that let you paint a gloomy narrative.

                I mean, your central point that things look grim, I agree with somewhat. It just sounds like you’re putting more energy into arguing for it, using whatever is to hand, than into trying to fix it.

                • @RiccosuaveOP
                  link
                  05 months ago

                  Pretty weird thing to insinuate yourself since what I actually said was THE EXACT FUCKING OPPOSITE 😂

                  • mozz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    05 months ago

                    I think this conversation has run its course and I wish you a pleasant evening