@Pacattack57 to No Stupid Questions • 2 months agoIf I live in a red state, would it be better to vote for rfk to take votes away from trump?message-square88arrow-up156arrow-down131file-text
arrow-up125arrow-down1message-squareIf I live in a red state, would it be better to vote for rfk to take votes away from trump?@Pacattack57 to No Stupid Questions • 2 months agomessage-square88file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•edit-22 months agoIt doesn’t matter how you define it. It matters how the people that report on it define it. And almost universally, that’s horse race numbers. Third parties are pretty much invisible for 95% of people until they start breaking into the horse race. Nobody have a fuck about Ralph Nader or Pat Buchanan till they mattered for the result of the actual election in 2000. But only after the fact.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_Inlink-3•2 months ago It matters how the people that report on it define it. No, it matter how the strategy analysts view the raw data. Not the media. Third parties are pretty much invisible for 95% of people until they start breaking into the horse race. Only if you focus on winning. Bernie didn’t run in the primaries to win. He ran to influence.
It doesn’t matter how you define it. It matters how the people that report on it define it. And almost universally, that’s horse race numbers.
Third parties are pretty much invisible for 95% of people until they start breaking into the horse race.
Nobody have a fuck about Ralph Nader or Pat Buchanan till they mattered for the result of the actual election in 2000. But only after the fact.
No, it matter how the strategy analysts view the raw data. Not the media.
Only if you focus on winning. Bernie didn’t run in the primaries to win. He ran to influence.
oh just stfu
Help help. I’m being repressed.