• @BluesF
    link
    English
    285 months ago

    Even descriptivists accept there has to be some degree of balance. Yes, language evolves, that doesn’t mean I can start calling my shoes bhurghs and expect anyone to know what I’m talking about.

    But if it catches on…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          There’s literally one in the topic of this post. And don’t tell me you haven’t dealt with crazy randos on Reddit that rake the same stance

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            05 months ago

            I’ve seen descriptivists take the position that if enough people use a made up word it counts as communication, but the only people I’ve ever seen saying “well I’m gonna call a tree a xopo instead” are prescriptivists who don’t understand descriptivism.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              25 months ago

              There are so many specific technical things in my workplace that have words in the small group that cares about them.

              They won’t find their way into dictionaries, but they are meaningful and useful. Some words like that have leaked into popular speech; my work isn’t the sort to have its gone grown words spread.

              (My phone dislikes me pluralising “cares”. I presume it was taught in America)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                Yeah, basically if you say something and someone understands it you’ve successfully communicated. Dictionaries are always lagging behind popular usage.

                In your phrase “group that cares”, cares is 3rd person singular. There’s no reason for a program to ever flag that as a spelling mistake so I’m not sure what’s going on with that.