• Flying SquidOP
    link
    96 months ago

    I would also say that claiming it is “not an original” suggests that it’s a copy rather than not being the original carving.

    • @thedirtyknapkin
      link
      146 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that big ole nose would require modern reinforced materials. maybe they tried and failed to make the anubis, but i doubt it would’ve worked very well.

    • AmidFuror
      link
      fedilink
      136 months ago

      They’re saying the head was replaced. Better phrasing would be that it is not in its original form.

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        36 months ago

        Re-carved anyway, although I’d like to know what happened to all the original stone. You’d think we’d be able to find it. It’s a lot of stone based on that drawing.

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            06 months ago

            On what? You can’t just chip stone off a statue and then hope you find a use for it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              You can chop it into smaller blocks to use on something nearby, idk honestly but I’d just assume it’s easier than bringing a new block from quarry

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                26 months ago

                At the age they were building pyramids and would have supposedly recarved the Sphinx, they were mostly using very large stone blocks. They only switched to smaller stone blocks in the Amarna period when Akhenaten had them do it to speed up construction. But that was centuries later.

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        26 months ago

        Why? Is there an original somewhere else once you do that?

      • @brygphilomena
        link
        16 months ago

        Your artwork would be an original. It’s not an unaltered mona Lisa, but it’s still an original painting.