Leopards eat popcorn.

  • @sunbrrnslapper
    link
    84 months ago

    Yes and no, IMO. Kamala Harris probably can’t win, in part because the US electorate are fairly racist and sexist. There is a part of the DNCs calculus that is about winning the general election.

    • @dariusj18
      link
      94 months ago

      I think the sexism is the more likely issue.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        54 months ago

        Biden is the safest choice because then we have Harris backup anyways.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Biden is not the safest choice, and Harris is not a good backup because she is a non-white woman, which means a meaningful proportion of our (frustratingly racist, sexist, and regressive) electorate will simply refuse to vote for her. Pragmatism is the order of the day. I don’t like Newsom for his neoliberal and pro-corporate tendencies, but he’s the best chance to stop fascists from winning this election at this point.

          Pragmatism and realpolitik must be the order of the day here. The only questions that the Democratic candidate should be answering at this point is “can you win against the fascists, and will you actually do anything to stop them”. In my eyes, Biden has categorically failed to do the second part; Harris, unfortunately, might not be able to pull out a win due to the prejudice of our electorate; meanwhile, Newsom is a white, heterosexual, wealthy, corporate friendly, vaguely-religious male, who, despite many flaws, does seem to recognize the clear and present danger that fascism poses.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                link
                34 months ago

                Jimmy Carter has the name recognition that Newsom lacks and Jimmy doesn’t look like the villain CEO in every ‘80’s movie.