The article is about the USA. At the point I commented, I didn’t see anything to indicate anyone was talking about Canada. Regardless, someone has challenged your assertion further down the thread in the Canadian context.
Okay, then. So why is this a problem? What’s the demographic breakdown of that total? You mentioned Hindus specifically, but what percentage of that total are Hindu? Why are Hindus problematic? Are there other groups that trouble you? Who are they, and why are they a problem? Are the groups that concern you monolithic and homogenous, or is it a subset of those groups that you see as a problem?
To be fair, I think replacement theory is nonsense, but I want to get down to the fundamentals of why you appear to think it’s valid.
The article is about the USA. At the point I commented, I didn’t see anything to indicate anyone was talking about Canada. Regardless, someone has challenged your assertion further down the thread in the Canadian context.
And they’re full of shit https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canada-clocks-fastest-population-growth-66-years-2023-2024-03-27/
Okay, then. So why is this a problem? What’s the demographic breakdown of that total? You mentioned Hindus specifically, but what percentage of that total are Hindu? Why are Hindus problematic? Are there other groups that trouble you? Who are they, and why are they a problem? Are the groups that concern you monolithic and homogenous, or is it a subset of those groups that you see as a problem?
To be fair, I think replacement theory is nonsense, but I want to get down to the fundamentals of why you appear to think it’s valid.
Removed by mod
Mod is tard