• poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That is not what they said at all. They said pure bug-for-bug compatible rebuilds don’t help RHEL. Which is undeniably true.

    • @gobbling871
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Just because they said that they don’t think RHEL clones contribute to the RHEL ecosystem doesn’t mean that it is entirely true. Are you new to PR speak?

      • poVoq
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Yet they consistently say that other contributions to Linux are very welcome and help RHEL, CentOS stream and everyone else. I think you have a strong case of selective memory and reading comprehension that only sees what fits into your pre-determined world-view 😜

        • @gobbling871
          link
          English
          42 years ago

          Yes. What they say and their actions are entirely contradictory in my own warped view.

          But good thing am not the only one who seems to think so 🤪 as clearly Oracle and SUSE agree with this view.

          • poVoq
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            If one thing has always been true, it is that Oracle will always chose the wrong side of history no matter what.

            Be careful who your allies are 😬

            • @gobbling871
              link
              English
              32 years ago

              I don’t really care that much for Oracle’s role in Linux but IBM’s Red Hat is clearly the drunk guy here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      I think maybe to point out that SUSE is already the second largest enterprise Linux provider in the market. They already studied RHEL code, this would have been a gentleman’s agreement broken not to outright copy each other. RHEL will easily copy SLES improvements and incorporate it into their own code, but SUSE will gain marketshare.