I’m enjoying Lemmy so far, for the most part.

Everything here is pretty good save for the fact that all the news and politics I can find is dominated by the same few accounts.

Half or more of the accounts have a very clear agenda. They modify headlines. Lie. Spread disinformation. And generally are just extremely toxic groups.

It doesn’t seem to be a secret here either. And moderators appear to have no interest in putting a stop to it.

So, where are you subbed to for reliable news and US/Global politics?

  • @OhthereyouareOP
    link
    English
    -21 year ago

    You came here and explained a bunch of nonsense. That’s why you got a passive aggressive response.

    Your comment is not only jaded and wrong, but it’s also not what I asked. You just came here to pontificate about your conspiracy theories about the media.

    Which, for the record, is exactly sort of stuff this post was inspired by. Hyperbole and dribble. You didn’t say anything of substance. You just talked down to me and rambled on about how nobody can trust the news. And that, is nonsense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Replace the word “news” with “historical document” and OP is discussing how to conduct academic research.

      • @OhthereyouareOP
        link
        English
        -21 year ago

        Man, this whole thread has tried my patience. It’s as if not a single Lemmy user thinks that current events are worth following.

        I’m not sure where everyone is getting their information, but this response is sorta terrifying.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Current events are certainly worth following and Lemmy could be a great place to add comments, ask questions and find additional context. A bot to scrape a relevant subreddit if content is needed.

          Complaining about bias is what I was addressing. You can get unbiased media. Al-jazeera is surprisingly good for world news.

          • @_cerpin_taxt_
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            Isn’t Al-Jazeera a state-owned Saudi network? I’d trust them about as much as RT, Fox, CNN, or TikTok.

              • @_cerpin_taxt_
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                Eh no thanks, I try to avoid getting my news from religious nuts lol. Good try, though.

          • @OhthereyouareOP
            link
            English
            -11 year ago

            I wasn’t complaining about bias though. That’s the thing. I was asking for reliable news aggregation on Lemmy. Big difference

            Nobody here seems to understand that though. Or, very few.

            I know news is bias. That isn’t the point. It’s the posting of blogs, YouTube videos, altering headlines, using alts to brigade voting and push an agenda… Here, on Lemmy, not in the media.

            The media is a known commodity. If I read an MSN article, I know their bias. If I read a fox news article, I definitely know their bias.

            A bunch of edgy “communists” and qanon accounts manipulating the large news and politics community ON LEMMY is the point. Not the news

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      You didn’t say anything of substance.

      He actually did but your mind is rejecting it.

      Nobody can trust the news. That’s not nonsense, it’s a fact. There are no reliable news sources.

      You can either deal with it or pretend that the source you find most comforting is the absolute truth and totally unbiased. But then you’d be lying to yourself, which is usually what makes people get defensive 🤔

      • @OhthereyouareOP
        link
        English
        -51 year ago

        Your definition of the word fact is seriously questionable.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          What is the news? How can you arrive at a definition of what constitutes the news without introducing bias?

          • @OhthereyouareOP
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            Okay. Fine. So, what is the solution then?

            Nobody should pay attention to anything? Where should I get my information? Should I visit all the people and ask them?

            How am I going to find out what happened today at the NATO Summit? Should I have gone to Lithuania and attended the summit in person?

            Is it alright if I read the article on NPR that explains what legislation past the Senate in the US? Or do I need to go visit the Senate myself so I can eliminate NPR’s bias?

            I’m very interested in science. Climate change and physics specifically. Where should I find out about the latest discoveries in science? Do I need to read all of the journals myself? Cuz, if so, I’m fucked. I don’t have that sort of time.

            And, admittedly, even though I consider myself well informed, I’m just not up to speed on all of the equations in astrophysics. So, now, I’m really fucked. Do I need to know a physicist personally so I can ask them?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              I think we are just saying that whatever generic, non offensive form of media that you consume is also biased in ways that you can’t quite perceive. You’ve encountered some alternative narratives on Lemmy and you regard them as biased without necessarily making the connection that your own news outlets and views are equally biased. It’s easy to see bias in others but hard to see in yourself