The Trump campaign on Tuesday filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission arguing money raised for President Joe Biden’s reelection bid cannot be transferred to Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign.

The complaint was filed by the Trump campaign’s general counsel David Warrington and argues transferring the funds would amount to “little more than a thinly veiled $91.5 million excessive contribution from one presidential candidate to another.”

“Kamala Harris is seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million dollar heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash — a brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended,” the complaint, a copy of which was obtained by CNN, states.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The chairman trump stooge, Sean Cooksey said on Fox yesterday that Harris getting Bidens war chest is “fraudulent.”

    Trump filled the complaint today. He basically signaled to Trump right on Fox, that trump could make the complaint and he will back him

    I guarantee he will drop everything to “rule” on this.

    Ellen Weintraub who is a democratic FEC commissioner said that what Harris is doing isn’t illegal but it doesn’t matter since the chairman who is above her is a fucking toadie to Trump since he gave him the job.

    There are 3 Democrats and 3 Republicans (all nominated by Trump) so it’s likely the vote will be gridlocked and therefore Harris not being able to get the money since the decision will be “on hold.”

    What’s funny is that Cooksey’s term expired in 2021 but he gets to keep serving until a replacement is appointed by the Senate. If MAGA gets the Senate, they will get 2 MAGA replacements for the expired Democrats making any vote 4 -2.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      104 months ago

      A gridlocked decision means nothing happens. That’s why nothing happens for all the legitimate stuff before the FEC.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        04 months ago

        The FEC chair could spin it and say that because a decision has not been made of is allowed or not, access to the money will be frozen

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          Based on what? The chair isn’t a tiebreaking vote, they don’t just get to make policy choices on an even split. The FEC needs 4 votes to act. There’s no spin involved, if they don’t have 4 votes, they can’t make an action. The chair doesn’t get to define the default result.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Well that is a relief. Although that relies on the chairman not pulling the “bullshit” card for Trump and saying the rules are different for this. MAGA does not respect precedent or the law.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              34 months ago

              They just don’t have that power. That’s not what a chairperson is. They can say whatever they want, it doesn’t make it real. You don’t have to rely on Republicans to not spontaneously manifest new authority. They aren’t magic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      Trump filled the compliment today

      trump could make the compliment and he will back him

      I’m guessing “compliment” was supposed to be “complaint”?