Biden delivered remarks from the Oval Office outlining his decision not to seek reelection, his first on-camera remarks since making that announcement on Sunday. In addition to explaining why he is ending his candidacy, he listed off his priorities for his remaining time as president.

“And I’m going to call for Supreme Court reform, because this is critical to our democracy,” Biden said.

Multiple outlets have reported that Biden is considering proposals to establish term limits for Supreme Court justices and an enforceable ethics code for those on the high court.

  • ignirtoq
    link
    fedilink
    1525 months ago

    Ironically if he did that and appointed new liberal justices, there’s a good chance the new Court would overturn this Court’s decision, and he could be convicted of murder and probably violating several other federal laws for that act.

    • @BradleyUffner
      link
      English
      1275 months ago

      I think there is something in the constitution about not being able to charge someone criminally for something retroactively, that wasn’t a crime at the time it was committed.

      Found it! Article 1, section 9, clause 3.

      • ignirtoq
        link
        fedilink
        885 months ago

        Ex post facto is for if a new law is passed making something a crime, and the act was committed before its passage. This is all about interpretation of already passed law. It’s basically the justices saying that this was against the law the whole time. Ex post facto doesn’t apply here.

      • Sabata
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        The president is currently above the law, so the constitution is as good as toilet paper.

      • @Cryophilia
        link
        85 months ago

        but nothing, nothing can come in the way of saving our democracy

        • Joe Biden

        Come on, Joe! Go out with a bang!

      • WhatTrees
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        He’d be dead before the sentencing anyway. Take one for the team Joe!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          Plus, it can’t be that hard to defend him with some perfectly reasonable doubts. A jury wouldn’t convict him for doing the right thing.

      • ignirtoq
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        No laws have been changed. Court decisions are not considered the passage of a law, so ex post facto doesn’t apply. Changes to how laws are interpreted don’t factor into ex post facto considerations.

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          25 months ago

          Yeah, I deleted the comment a while ago when I read another response explaining that. TIL!