• Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    25 months ago

    Why do you believe people who have a strong stance must be ignoring facts to have a strong stance?

    • @Cryophilia
      link
      15 months ago

      Straw man. Or misunderstanding.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          25 months ago

          You declared a causality that I did not intend to imply.

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            45 months ago

            Still, dogmatism in any form is a plague. Pro Americanism, anti Americanism, whatever. Ignoring facts to suit your chosen narrative is gross.

            You are directly implying that pro-americanism and anti-americanism are dogmatism, and that these stances necessarily ignore facts to suit their chosen narrative.

            You can elaborate what you meant here.

            Even if you did not intend on implying this, you did introduce the concept of dogmatism to a conversation surrounding how Lemmy generally leans anti-America, inserting on your hand an implication that this is due to dogmatism. You’re accusing the average Lemmy user of dogmatism by association, simply for holding an anti-America stance.

            • @Cryophilia
              link
              35 months ago

              That’s what I meant by causality. Pro-americanism and anti-americanism are not inherently dogmatic. It’s just that the anti-american sentiments I see on lemmy are usually dogmatic. It’s an observational theorem, not a derived one.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -15 months ago

                    “Anti-Americanism is bad” -> “It’s not really Anti-American, it’s Anti-America” -> “Dogmatism and belief in something while ignoring countering facts is bad”

                    It’s an assertion of dogmatism on the Anti-America crowd with no real frame of reference.