• Io Sapsai 🌱
    link
    fedilink
    55 months ago

    It’s generally legal and heavily subsidised. See also animal agriculture.

      • 🦄🦄🦄
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        -75 months ago

        So you agree that if it isn’t for sustenance, in the case where you can just simply eat something else, it should be illegal?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          Sustenance doesn’t mean “the only thing available”.

          Look, I’m excited for lab-grown meat. I’ve reduced my meat consumption significantly over the last year or two. I may not be “in your camp” exactly, but I’m an ally. And it’s probably better to earn and keep allies than to argue semantics in an adversarial way. Win more flies with honey and all that.

          • 🦄🦄🦄
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            -25 months ago

            I assume you agree o the general statement “Animals shouldn’t be killed for pleasure.”

            If you then have two options for food, one including animal meat and one without, all other things being equal, even nutrition wise, then how is it not “for pleasure” to chose the option with meat?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              05 months ago

              Killing for pleasure implies hunting for sport.

              Chopping up a cow so that tons of people can buy its meat is different than someone hunting bears for sport and leaving the corpse where it lands.

            • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24
              link
              -15 months ago

              for most people making taht decision does not involve killing anything. both options have already been harvested and presented.