• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -68
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Good, I’d rather not have you in my bar if your behavior is such that you’re worried about not being able to get in my bar.

    • @Bruhh
      link
      English
      502 months ago

      Except now the bars can easily sell my data to corps without my goddamn permission. It isn’t about having things to hide. It’s about resonable privacy. According to the article, the company can track VIPs and “big spenders” and treat them differently. They can also deny you entry on “potential” risks. I wonder what systems they use to determine a denial of entry.

      • @200ok
        link
        English
        172 months ago

        It’s all self-reported. For example, if they don’t like how much you tipped, they can flag you. It’s all subjective.

        • FlavoredButtHair
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          I stopped drinking years ago, even then I just bought my own and maybe shared with friends.

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      Can’t wait to get banned from the queer bar in my neighborhood after the bartender I buy whiskey from on my business trip to Kentucky flags my removed ass as a major disruption because they think I’m a child-grooming Satanist.

    • Pika
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You may not have read that right. I don’t think they are saying that it’s their behavior that is the reason that they won’t enter, it’s the fact that you are using a partner that makes digital copies and photographs patrons. It’s a huge invasion of privacy. It’s one thing for security cameras, it’s a whole different level to also be copying ID’s AND then also sharing that information to parties outside the establishment.