• @TrickDacy
    link
    41 month ago

    I’m not sure what you mean. I have updated bash with a single homebrew command.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        5
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Ok, yeah, I can see that there would be times this could matter but like 90% of the time this wouldn’t have mattered for my use case afaik. I didn’t realize you couldn’t backup the old copy in /bin and symlink to the brew one from there. In fact I thought I did do that long ago.

    • @computergeek125
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      If it’s anything like when I used a Mac regularly 7y ago, Homebrew doesn’t install to /bin, it installs to /usr/local/bin, which only works for scripts that use env in their shell “marker” (if you don’t call it directly with the shell). You’re just putting a higher bash in the path, not truly updating the one that comes with the system.

        • @computergeek125
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          Gotcha. Yeah low level Unix has some weird stuff going on sometimes.

      • @paperplane
        link
        21 month ago

        That’s mostly still true, with the small caveat that the default prefix on arm64 macOS is /opt/homebrew rather than /usr/local, so you might have to add it explicitly to your PATH

        • @computergeek125
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          Oh thank goodness, that was one of my main complaints with the system. Did they ever get around to requiring sudo like Macports (and any other reasonable system level packages manager on BSD/Linux)?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          Just because it doesn’t matter for most users doesn’t mean it isn’t a real limitation. I acknowledged as much in my original comment.