Every empire falls. Its collapse becomes inevitable once its rulers lose all sense of how absurd and abhorrent they have become

There is only one country in the world right now, in the midst of Israel’s slaughter in Gaza, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is guaranteed dozens of standing ovations from the vast majority of its elected representatives.

That country is not Israel, where he has been a hugely divisive figure for many years. It is the United States.

On Wednesday, Netanyahu was back-slapped, glad-handed, whooped and cheered as he slowly made his way - hailed at every step as a conquering hero - to the podium of the US Congress.

This was the same Netanyahu who has overseen during the past 10 months the slaughter - so far - of some 40,000 Palestinians, around half of them women and children. More than 21,000 other children are reported missing, most of them likely dead under rubble.

It was the same Netanyahu whose government is standing trial for committing what the ICJ, the world’s highest judicial body, has termed a “plausible genocide”.

And yet, there was just one visible protester in the congressional chamber. Rashida Tlaib, the only US legislator of Palestinian heritage, sat silently grasping a small black sign. On one side it said: “War criminal”. On the other: “Guilty of genocide.”

One person among hundreds mutely trying to point out that the emperor was naked.

Indeed, the optics were stark.

This looked less like a visit by a foreign leader than a decorated elder general being welcomed back to the Senate in ancient Rome, or a grey-haired British viceroy from India embraced in the motherland’s parliament, after brutally subduing the “barbarians” on the fringes of empire.

This was a scene familiar from history books: of imperial brutality and colonial savagery, recast by the seat of the imperium as valour, honour, civilisation. And it looked every bit as absurd, and abhorrent, as it does when we look back on what happened 200 or 2,000 years ago.

  • @Eldritch
    link
    English
    135 months ago

    They didn’t imply they did. It was a quote from the posted article. And my interpretation of it was that they were quoting it specifically because it’s the sentiment many people get about ole left lane here.

    Now while I might agree with the sentiment. I do still think it might go a little far towards being a personal attack. It’s not without some merit. Though that probably still does not justify posting any reasonably personal attack.

    • @jordanlund
      shield
      M
      link
      05 months ago

      The quote does not appear in the original article either, it was entirely made up and attributed to linkerbaan which is why I removed it.

      • @Eldritch
        link
        English
        25 months ago

        Fair enough I suppose

        • @jordanlundM
          link
          25 months ago

          I mean, look at it like this… they manufactured a quote and used it to attack another user. We don’t allow attacking other users, full stop, so while the method may have been new, it’s still removable.

          On top of that, if linkerbaan or anyone else had actually said that, unironically, it’s a bannable offense.

          So really what OP was doing wasn’t just attacking linkerbaan, they were hoping the mods would see the quote, assume it was accurate, and ban linkerbaan.