• @d00ery
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This chart does backup your statement that low income families have the highest birthrate.

      It does not show whether people have to work, which is the point I was disputing (that rich people who don’t have to work have fewer children)

      Looking at the ONS data the percentage of women who’s employment status is ‘unclassified’ is, by far, the largest proportion of women giving birth

        • @d00ery
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Lol, I have no idea, a million isn’t that much if one has a big house, staff, and private jets.

          I’m not quite sure what your point is?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            Multimillionaires don’t need to work, they could stop working and live off the interest on their wealth, yet their fertility rate is lower than people who make under 50k/year, which is less than the interest you make on a million in savings.

            • @d00ery
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              That’s assuming they don’t want to keep their big houses, expensive holidays etc? Generally expenditure grows with income.

              I think your argument is that people don’t have children for reasons other than wealth. My argument is that wealth and the ability to live a certain life style does affect people’s decision on having children.