They fought for their right to party

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    715 months ago

    So each drank 2-3 bottles of wine and some spirits. It doesn’t sound something unbelievable huge amount to me.

    • @PugJesusOP
      link
      English
      675 months ago

      A bottle of Madeira is no small thing. It’s not an unbelievable tab, but it’s a fairly raucous night out, when many people imagine the Founding Fathers as a bunch of stuffy guys in wigs. Which, I mean, they were to some degree, but also partying is a long American tradition. o7

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        185 months ago

        I just look up Madeira, is says it’s 18% alcohol, that’s still not a spirit, yeah it’s not a classic wine. They were grown up men celebrating something, I guess they also ate something, I still don’t understand why is it a big deal.

        • Tar_Alcaran
          link
          fedilink
          265 months ago

          I mean, 3 bottles of wine, 3 or 4 whiskeys and call it the better part of a liter of punch is a fair bit of alcohol. Im pretty sure it would have my “2 beers a week” stomach giving up halfway.

          But it’s not a blackout drunk amount if spread over an evening and night. Student-me would consider an above average night.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            20
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Did some quick calculations and based on those on average one person drank 300-400ml of pure ethanol, if drank at once it would be a deadly amount for 80kg male and even spread over about 16 hours very drunk would be an understatement

            If i would ever attempt to drink that much i would make sure that some much less drunk would watch me the whole night until morning to make sure i am fine

            Though if the wine bottles were more like 500ml or 375ml the overall amount becomes more reasonable for a party average as i don’t think while some could drink that much and be fine, that everyone could drink that much in a night without the ‘party’ becoming people being blacked out on the floor swimming in their own vomit unless the invitations were sent based on their alcohol tolerance

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              165 months ago

              Keeping in mind that these people were what modern people would consider to be alcoholics, this is till a fuckload of alcohol lol

    • @Donkter
      link
      75 months ago

      Also don’t forget that when this tab says “bottle” for liquor it almost certainly doesn’t mean a fifth like is standard today.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        115 months ago

        They were mostly smaller, actually. Some 400 to 500 ml were pretty standard, unlike the bigger 750ml that you see today. Depending on what you bought and from where, your bottle could be really anything, but they were handmade and thick, so really big bottles would be really heavy.

        • @Donkter
          link
          25 months ago

          Oh I did mean smaller yeah. I see how it could be ambiguous.

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Both wine and beer/cider bottles were basically completely non-standardized around then. They were mostly smaller, so with the benefit of the doubt let’s call it about as much as today.

      Punch is harder to say. It was somewhere around 5 to 10% alcohol, but unfortunately a punch bowl could be a communal thing, being the size of a large family salad bowl and holding over 5 liters. But punch was also served from those bowel into handheld bowls, which was basically a cup.

      Let’s go with the big ones and add a liter of punch each. So that 3 bottles of wine equivalent, 4 whiskey’s and a beer. Not exactly light drinking, but hardly the thing you brag about I would think.