@PugJesus to [email protected]English • edit-22 months agoFounding Party ruleimagemessage-square58arrow-up1448arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1447arrow-down1imageFounding Party rule@PugJesus to [email protected]English • edit-22 months agomessage-square58file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•2 months agoThat’s my assumption as well, but I don’t know what the protocol for this type of affair would have been. I was also thinking that there might also have been ‘female companionship’ provided.
55 attendees - i would assume these 55 plus their aides.
That’s my assumption as well, but I don’t know what the protocol for this type of affair would have been.
I was also thinking that there might also have been ‘female companionship’ provided.