• @Dasus
    link
    02 months ago

    “Most of what makes an assault rifle are pretty random but I feel like selective fire is a pretty important one. Aight gun rant over.”

    As someone trained in an army, it’s weird seeing American politics trying to pretend like being able to switch to full automatic is somehow a game changer, that that needs to be the line, that that is what makes a firearm properly dangerous. First off, you don’t use full auto really anywhere. You use semi-auto, double-shots, center-mass. Secondly, those “bump-stocks” are awful easy to make for the semi-autos already sold at supermarkets in the US.

    Most of what makes an assault rifle is a somewhat large magazine capacity and semi-automatic firing. Look at pretty much any conflict since a bit after WWI. What were the major advantages of the M1 Garand, for instance? It’s not a huge mag, 8-round internal box magazine, but that added with the semi-automatic firing makes it far superior to any bolt-action rifle.

    Point being if it shoots rather fast and has several bullets, you should probably have some regulations on it.

    https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-simple-truth-about-gun-control

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      I wasnt even thinking about full auto when I said selective fire, I was thinking burst more specifically three shot. I was also very tired when I made that whole comment hence why its so scatter brained.