• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 months ago

    You know, I don’t really see the harm. How is this not just a scaled up version of keeping pictures?

    • @RememberTheApollo_
      link
      72 months ago

      There’s a difference between some photos and keeping an entire grungy room as a shrine.

        • @RememberTheApollo_
          link
          32 months ago

          Don’t be stubborn. I think you can intellectually understand there’s a big difference between the two.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            In this specific case, it actually seems fine to me. Like the other poster said, what are they supposed to do, turn their dead son’s room into a home theater? I’m sure that won’t put a damper on movie night. /s

            As it is, it serves as a much more immersive version of a photograph. I don’t see the harm.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        It’s not, but if a sudden change in acceptability happens do to a continuous change in scale, I feel very comfortable asking why.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s an awkward situation for sure. I’m trying to imagine what could be done with the room if they cleaned it out. All I can think is that they could never convert it into a room that they would want to spend time in, and the only alternative seems to be storage which almost seems disrespectful to the memory.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            02 months ago

            Yeah. I mostly just thought this was a sweet memorial. It doesn’t necessarily mean they’re in denial or anything, they just want to keep a piece of him there like most grieving people do.