The legislation is a direct response to the Supreme Court’s ruling last month that former President Donald Trump has some immunity for official presidential acts.

  • Coffee AddictOPM
    link
    English
    265 months ago

    “Given the dangerous and consequential implications of the Court’s ruling, legislation would be the fastest and most efficient method to correcting the grave precedent the Trump ruling presented,” Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement. “With this glaring and partisan overreach, Congress has an obligation — and a constitutional authority — to act as a check and balance to the judicial branch.”

    Passing this bill should be a no-brainer. But with the current state of the republican party, I expect them to fully oppose it.

    • @iamericandre
      link
      English
      105 months ago

      Which in reality would mean they are arguing for the immunity of a democrat

      • @hohoho
        link
        English
        55 months ago

        They don’t think a democrat would abuse this power. They know a republican would.

      • @Plastic_Ramses
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Why does everyone keep bringing up “immunity” as if it applies to democrats?

        The supreme court is the body that decides if an “official act” is official or not.

        Democrats will literally never be given immunity because they are not republicans.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        15 months ago

        Yes, but they know that the Democrats won’t do anything with that immunity, so they don’t care.

    • @p5yk0t1km1r4ge
      link
      English
      25 months ago

      Obviously. They’re the ones who introduced this scumfuck of a bill in the first place, after all.

    • @ccunning
      link
      English
      25 months ago

      Perhaps they’ll get on board if they lose the election…